Crossmark II vs Double Fighter III review
In this entry we are going to compare and review Maxxis Crossmark II vs Continental Double Fighter III tyres. Both manufactured by different brands, Maxxis and Continental respectively, these tyres have been designed to be used for different purposes. Whilst Maxxis Crossmark II is better for mountain activities, Continental Double Fighter III is a great choice if your needs are more aligned to Mountainbike Tires activities.
| Crossmark II | Double Fighter III | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Crossmark II improves on the speed of its predecessor while improving grip in intermediate conditions. The legendary center ridge still flies on hard pack, and the updated tread pattern provides better braking and cornering over a wide range of trail conditions. A great choice if you want to go fast everywhere. | The ‘double’: light rolling and quiet on tarmac, yet grips on tracks and gravel roads.Robust rubber sidewalls make it impervious to damage even over rough ground.The ideal tire for transforming an off road bike to a nippy city racer. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features
| Features
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UsageXC (Cross Country) | Usage- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technologies- | Technologies- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Specifications26
27.5
29
| Specifications"29"
"28"
"27.5"
"26"
"24"
"20"
"16"
|
